Workflow Idea for 4.10

[Kevin Ottens]

On Friday 16 March 2012 21:31:11 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Sounds good.
> But OTOH, having one workflow for KDE frameworks (i.e. not even all of KDE
> SC) would be also a really good thing to have. It will make contributing
> easier.

That's pretty much Aaron's point yes. And I clearly see the value in it of 
course. I've to take into account the current drawbacks identified with the 
current proposal too though.

> Would 2) be an option for KDE frameworks ?

Could be[*]. But as you probably gathered from my previous email I'm 
purposefully not jumping on a definitive choice just yet. More options to 
investigate and consequences to take into account.

Regards.

[*] If we were to bless a single one, it's the one with most chances to make 
it as the one size fit all one in my books ATM.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20120318/dbdcd407/attachment.sig>