[Kde-extra-gear] Re: Cleanup about to start - steps for future

[Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò]

Ben Burton wrote:
> I wouldn't mind if you could add knetload to this list.  It's not
> actively maintained at the present, but that doesn't mean it's no longer
> useful (though there are a few bugs that could really do with fixing).
> 
> Also, since kcpuload and knetload share the same codebase to a large
> extent (or at least did when I was working with them), it would be a
> shame to separate them now.
Actually I'm planning for the merge of the main codebases, I also requested
help to add a new library di keg-libraries module to share the code between
them :) ( http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.extra-gear/438 )

Also I have updated KNetLoad more recently than KCPULoad so I don't think
the one who can be 'unmaintained' is KNetLoad :P

-- 
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
dgp85 at users.sourceforge.net - http://flameeyes.web.ctonet.it/