Status of Kalzium SoK?

[Christoph Feck]

On Tuesday 02 June 2015 04:04:08 anu mittal wrote:
> > > On 1 Jun 2015 4:21 am, "Christoph Feck" <cfeck at kde.org> wrote:
> > > > can we please get an update on the Kalzium porting status? If
> > > > you need help, or If you no longer plan to work on it,
> > > > please inform us.
> > On Monday 01 June 2015 15:59:39 anu mittal wrote:
> > > Actually I had completely built the project,Kalzium. Only part
> > > that was left was porting the warnings.! Then I had a talk
> > > with my mentor (Aleix Pol) regarding the same since there were
> > > my university examinations and also too many files in my
> > > project so I couldn't remove all the warnings.! Also the sok
> > > period was exceeded. :(
> > > 
> > > Repository link : http://
> > > <http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Fkalzium%2Fanumittal%2Fport
> > > ing. git> quickgit.kde.org
> > > <http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Fkalzium%2Fanumittal%2Fport
> > > ing. git>/?p=
> > > <http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Fkalzium%2Fanumittal%2Fport
> > > ing .git> clones%2Fkalzium%2Fanumittal%2Fporting.git
> > > <http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=clones%2Fkalzium%2Fanumittal%2Fport
> > > ing. git>
> > > 
> > > I haven't worked on it after that.!
> On 2 Jun 2015 12:41 am, "Christoph Feck" <cfeck at kde.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks for the update, Anu. If you allow us to import your
> > changes into the kalzium/frameworks branch, we can work on any
> > remaining issues.
> Yes, sure.

We noticed the porting happened in multiple branches. Which of the 
branches is the one that you consider the best starting point for 
further porting?