Replacing file-system by database in KStars

[Vijay Dhameliya]

Hi

Thank you very much Macro for giving clue of the way to do it. I agree with
you that plan and diagram for workflow is must. I shall first plan and
start preparing diagram of database structure for KStars.

I will soon prepare rough diagram of flow and share with you so you can
give your suggestion and so on. And we can improve it to level best as
KStars team give suggestions.

BTW I have good experience with development of Database Managment in Qt and
I hope it will help us here :)


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Marco Calignano
<marco.calignano at gmail.com>wrote:

> HI!
>
> I also think a database is a better approach than a file base system. But
> you didn't address the first and biggest think to do. Before you can start
> coding you should really plan your database.
> To create a database it is a real big work. You need to plan in advance
> even for feature are not at the horizon yet. If you plan it correctly you
> can then include localization as well.
> I was thinking to jump on KStar to help, so maybe this is my cue. I will
> have to learn how the data are structured and I can help with the database
> development. But I would like to see some diagram here in the Kde-Edu list.
> So that all the KStar team can also have a look and give their opinion.
>
> Cheers
> Marco
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:39 AM, Alexander Wolf <alex.v.wolf at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> 2014-01-28 Vijay Dhameliya <vijay.atwork13 at gmail.com>
>>
>> Currently when KStars is launched, it reads data corresponding to
>>> different Skyobject from respective file in loaddata() methods. And I have
>>> tracked out all the classes where we are loading data by reading file.
>>>
>>> I researched bit on the topic and I found that loading data from
>>> database is always much better option then doing same from file.
>>>
>>> If we replace file system with QSql following are the Pros:
>>>
>>> 1) We will not have to ship so many files with Kstars
>>> 2) Loading from database is quicker than doing same from file
>>> 3) Code for load methods will be reduced in size
>>>
>>> Cons:
>>> 1) I will have to move all data from files into database by temporary
>>> methods
>>>
>>> So I am planning to start coding to replace file system by database on
>>> my local branch.
>>>
>>> Can you please give your views and suggestion regarding the same ? I am
>>> sure that It will be very helpful to me. :)
>>>
>>
>> What about localization support for strings (like names of DSO) from
>> those files?
>>
>> --
>> With best regards, Alexander
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> kde-edu mailing list
>> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Life is short, so learn from your mistakes
> And stand behind, the choices that you make
>
> Face each day with both eyes open wide
> And try to give don't keep it all inside
>
>                                                Dream Theater
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu at mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-edu/attachments/20140128/b246193c/attachment.html>