[kde-edu]: Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Re: kde-edu git repos to validate

[Jeremy Whiting]

Kanagram repo looks good to me.

Jeremy

P.S. Did we decide anything about the non keduvocdocument libs in libkdeedu?
do we want each lib in it's own repo? or one kde-edulibs repo?

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Nicolas Alvarez
<nicolas.alvarez at gmail.com>wrote:

> Ian Monroe wrote:
> > I've only done a basic look over on each repo (looked at branches,
> > made sure each only had one parentless commit), plan on doing more
> > tonight. But really it helps to know the history of the code  to know
> > if everything looks right. Also if folks could do build tests that
> > would be helpful.
> >
> > The repos are dated from the 13th or so.
> >
> > You can see them under scratch/ianmonroe at http://quickweb.kde.org
> >
> > To clone them all, launch `ruby`, copy the following code and end on a
> > newline + ctrl-d.
> >
> > [
> > "blinken",
> > "cantor",
> > "kalgebra",
> > "kalzium",
> > "kanagram",
> > "kbruch",
> > "kgeography",
> > "khangman",
> > "kig",
> > "kiten",
> > "klettres",
> > "kmplot",
> > "kstars",
> > "ktouch",
> > "kturtle",
> > "kwordquiz",
> > "libkdeedu",
> > "marble",
> > "parley",
> > "rocs",
> > "step"
> > ].each { |project|
> > `git clone git://anongit.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/#{project}`<http://anongit.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/#%7Bproject%7D%60>
> > }
>
> Here's a suggestion: If you review a repository, even if you find nothing
> wrong, say so in this thread. Then, if you want to look at a repository,
> pick one that got the least reviews by others.
>
> That way we avoid having 3 people carefully looking at one repo and some
> other repo being ignored.
>
> --
> Nicolas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-scm-interest mailing list
> Kde-scm-interest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-edu/attachments/20110207/abe0c944/attachment.htm