[kde-doc-english] Review Request 127906: Remove qt5options manpage docbook

[David Faure]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/#review95451
-----------------------------------------------------------



I don't have a strong opinion on whether to keep it or not, but note that your reasoning is incomplete. A lot of command-line options have moved up to the base classes QGuiApplication and QCoreApplication.

- David Faure


On May 13, 2016, 2:12 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 13, 2016, 2:12 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdoctools
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> All options in this docbook like
> 
> display, session, cmap, ncols, nograb, dograb, sync, fn, bg, fg, btn, name, title, visual, inputstyle, im, noxim, reverse, stylesheet
> 
> are valid for Qt 3.3 QApplication, see
> 
> http://doc.qt.io/archives/3.3/qapplication.html#QApplication
> 
> 
> In Qt 5.6 a QApplication automatically supports a few command line options like 
> style, stylesheet, widgetcount, reverse, qmljsdebugger
> see http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qapplication.html
> 
> 
> Do we really want to provide a manpage docbook for that?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/CMakeLists.txt 4efee3b 
>   docs/qt5options/CMakeLists.txt 7e31e0f 
>   docs/qt5options/man-qt5options.7.docbook d5891eb 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20160513/816d274b/attachment.html>