[kde-doc-english] Documentation pages on techbase

[Burkhard Lück]

Am Donnerstag, 28. April 2016, 09:55:11 CEST schrieb Burkhard Lück:
> Am Thursday 28 April 2016, 08:34:43 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan:
> > написане Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:08:59 +0300, Luigi Toscano
> > 
> > <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it>:
> > > Burkhard Lück ha scritto:
> > >> Am Wednesday 20 April 2016, 17:01:52 schrieb Burkhard Lück:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>> 
> > >>> we have some pages about Documentation on techbase like
> > >>> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation
> > >>> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4
> 
> These pages need to be updated, if we want to keep them
> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4/kdepim/kmail
> 
> Projects/Documentation/KDE4/kdepim and all subpages have to be deleted -> 8
> years old and just a draft
> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4_(health_table)
> > >>> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE_(health_table)/kcontrol5
> > >>> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4_(health_table)/kcontrol
> > >>> 
> > >>> Projects/Documentation/KDE4_(health_table)/kioslaves
> 
> KDE4_(health_table) pages have to be renamed (KDE4 is wrong) + moved
> 
> Projects/Documentation/Building_Blocks -> delete it, we have the
> fundamentals docbooks
> 
> community has already a page about Documentation (https://community.kde.org/
> KDE_Documentation), but that is apparently only about Documentation in
> Wiki. How to handle this? The main content is > 6 years old.
> 
> > >>> ... and maybe more. How to find them?
> > >>> 
> > >>> These pages are somewhat outdated (kde4) and should be on
> > >>> community.kde.org,
> > >>> right?
> > >>> 
> > >>> Techbase has a page Documentation_Primer/Manual version 0.03
> > >>> 2013-05-01 and
> > >>> we have another version 0.02 (2005-05-21) l10n.kde.org, that does not
> > >>> make sense and should be cleaned up.
> 
> Lets remove the Documentation Primer 0.02 from l10n.kde.org and replaced it
> with a link to the latest page.
> 
> > > IRC discussion (#kde-docs):
> > > 
> > > [22:59:40] <tosky> blueck: hi, about the pages on techbase, ping
> > > ochurlaud who
> > > is helping with the reorganization of wikis
> > > [23:01:50] <blueck> tosky: so you agree the pages should go to
> > > community?
> > > [23:02:02] <tosky> blueck: most likely, yes
> > > [23:03:23] <blueck> tosky: I'd like to push
> > > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127758/ any comments/review?
> > > [23:03:29] <tosky> blueck: the documentation primer was copied there to
> > > edit
> > > it in a easier way, iirc; claus_chr and yurchor should remember the
> > > story
> > > [23:04:40] <blueck> tosky: ok, I'll ask yurchor. but then we should
> > > remove the
> > > outdated primer from l10n.k.o
> > > [23:05:12] <tosky> blueck: I don't think that the wiki version was
> > > really
> > > updated, and I have a dejavu about this discussion :)
> > > [23:06:25] <blueck> tosky:  lets take this discussion to the mailinglist
> > > yurchor can explain
> > > [23:08:13] <tosky> sure
> > > [23:08:20] <tosky> can I copy&paste this discussion?
> > > [23:08:40] <blueck> tosky: yes please
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have not answered in this discussion because the reason to move the
> > pages to community is unclear for me.
> 
> https://kate-editor.org/2010/07/26/the-mission-of-kdes-wikis/

How do we proceed here?

-- 
Burkhard Lück