[kde-doc-english] Review Request 127991: kdesvn handbook update

[Luigi Toscano]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#review96269
-----------------------------------------------------------




doc/index.docbook (line 34)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#comment65064>

    I wonder if we could agree on a more stable version than using the git revision :)



doc/index.docbook (line 614)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#comment65065>

    Question for the author: is this still true?



doc/index.docbook (line 804)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#comment65066>

    kdesdk-kioslaves are still kdelibs4 based, and it seems that the subversion one is simply not functional:
    commits.kde.org/kdesdk-kioslaves/a0a3ac8baeccc6a17f6e2774768ce73bad0596b8
    
    kdesvn maintainers, do you want to update also that kioslave? But anyway, the references here should be most likely commented/removed for now.



doc/index.docbook (line 2287)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#comment65067>

    This should be probably removed (pending comments from maintainers)



doc/index.docbook (line 2299)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/#comment65068>

    The questions here should be removed: the referenced ticket does not exists and the paths for libraries are incorrect in the Qt5 world.


- Luigi Toscano


On Mag. 27, 2016, 8:14 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Mag. 27, 2016, 8:14 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation and Christian Ehrlicher.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdesvn
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> proofread + update
> remove comments
> bump date+releaseinfo
> from kde, not for kde
> add some missing items
> remove appendix
> 
> 
> What is "Logs follow node changes"?
> 
> Do we really need the FAQ, seems outdated to me?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   doc/index.docbook 3594b5c 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127991/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> passes checkXML5
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20160607/d37fd25c/attachment-0001.html>