[kde-doc-english] Policy about RR's for docbook changes
Yuri Chornoivan
yurchor at ukr.net
Thu Jul 28 05:19:20 UTC 2016
середа, 27-лип-2016 23:08:53 Burkhard Lück написано:
> Hi,
>
> if I file a review request for docbooks I always add two groups/devels as
> reviewers:
>
> 1) group docs to check for conformity with docbook rules, wording, markup
> etc.
>
> 2) devel group or persons to check the technical aspect + feature
> correctness in the update.
>
> Adding two different groups/persons to the RR I expect to get an OK="Ship
> It" from both groups for the different aspects of the review ;-).
>
> If I get first a "Ship It" from a docs group member and the RR is only about
> docbook related issues I usually commit, but not in case the RR is about
> behavioral/feature changes, then I' need to have a confirmation from a
> developer.
>
> The other way round (first a "Ship It" from a devel group member) I am
> always unsure how to handle that.
> Do you think there is already a "Ship It" for the RR, no need to add an OK
> from groups docs and I should just wait x days to commit or should I expect
> an explicit "Ship It" from the group docs?
>
> Thanks
Hi,
Yes, I think so.
Our group is not that crowded as we want and there are not that much RRs to
ignore or forget to review. Personally, I look at each RR and if something
wrong found, just add a comment. Thus, it is enough to have "Ship it!" from
developers to make me think that RR is worth to merge.
Best regards,
Yuri
More information about the kde-doc-english
mailing list