[kde-doc-english] Review Request 117985: frameworks/kjs: add missing man page docbook

[Kevin Ottens]

> On May 5, 2014, 7:17 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > IIRC that was intentional as to not have kjs depend on kdoctools.
> 
> Alex Merry wrote:
>     Hrm. Distros like Debian aren't going to be super-happy about this. And KJS is officially a porting aid, so I'm not sure bumping it to tier 3 is that big of an issue (especially since the practical dependencies are still minimal).

OK, makes sense then. This patch should update the metainfo.yaml though.


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/#review57287
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 4, 2014, 7:21 a.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 4, 2014, 7:21 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kjs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> add missing man page docbook, which got lost in the transition from kdelibs to frameworks
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 60ee824 
>   docs/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/kjs/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   docs/kjs/man-kjs5.1.docbook PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> build + installed, viewed with "man kjs5"
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20140617/79f6eacf/attachment.html>