[kde-doc-english] Review Request 115876: More generic DocBookXML -> DocBookXML4

[Alex Merry]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/#review50181
-----------------------------------------------------------


Does this have any other users than kdoctools?  If not, it should probably just move to that module.  Even if kde4support ends up using it, I don't view that as a reason to put it in ECM.

- Alex Merry


On Feb. 18, 2014, 10:52 p.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 10:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Build System, Documentation and KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: extra-cmake-modules
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> FindDocBookXML.cmake was originally part of kdelibs/kdoctools, but not installed. The version currently in ECM is, as the old one, is quite tight to the old behavior, it hardcodes the DocBookXML version currently used.
> - the rename reflect the fact that it's used for DocBookXML4; a future DocBookXML5 could be added if needed;
> - the structure allows a generic usage ("find DocBookXML version 4.x"), not tied to the usage in KDocTools. KDocTools will be changed to call it with the correct version (the version number is a "property" of KDocTools, not used outside it, but hidden inside meinproc5 and libKF5XsltKde.a).
> Next changes: 
> - use DocBookXML4 (so DocBookXML4_* instead of DOCBOOKXML_* legacy variables) in frameworks
> - move the definition of legacy DOCBOOKXML_* in kde4support
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   find-modules/FindDocBookXML.cmake b6d623e 
>   find-modules/FindDocBookXML4.cmake PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiles (some changes are needed in KDocTools, I will add them to another review).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Luigi Toscano
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20140218/64f1b500/attachment.html>