[kde-doc-english] Review Request 111239: Documentation: Reworked Security Reading tab to include missing sections.

[Burkhard Lück]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111239/#review35056
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



doc/kmail/configure.docbook
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111239/#comment25664>

    Maybe this para is too long?
    Would it ease readability to break it into two paras?



doc/kmail/configure.docbook
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111239/#comment25663>

    Does this really pass checkXML ;-)



doc/kmail/configure.docbook
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111239/#comment25665>

    Splitted into two paras is probably easier to read ?


- Burkhard Lück


On June 25, 2013, 12:49 p.m., Scarlett Clark wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111239/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 25, 2013, 12:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, KDEPIM and Laurent Montel.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Reworked the reading tab to include scam emails and encrypted reading options. Also updated existing options.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   doc/kmail/configure.docbook c5778a8 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111239/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> checkXML index.docbook, meinproc4 index.docbook, EBN.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scarlett Clark
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20130625/d0e3ac8c/attachment.html>