[kde-doc-english] New mascots and KDE docs in PDF

[Yuri Chornoivan]

> Am Freitag, 28. Juni 2013, 19:17:59 schrieb Yuri Chornoivan:
> > написане Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:49:15 +0300, Myriam Schweingruber
> > 
> > <myriam at kde.org>:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Yuri Chornoivan <yurchor at ukr.net> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> 
> > >> As you might know, we have a new rendering of KDE mascots [1].
> > >> 
> > >> Is it be appropriate to use them for documentation PDFs?
> > >> 
> > >> KMail docs with the new mascots:
> > >> 
> > >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/55247264/kmail.pdf
> > > 
> > > Looks akward TBH. KMail is a professional tool, having toy mascots
> > > might be OK for Edu or Games, it really looks very unprofessional for
> > > a handbook of a software that also targets enterprises. I wouldn't put
> > > the old Konqi in there either, for the same reasons.
> > > 
> > >> KMail docs with the current logo:
> > >> 
> > >> http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdepim/kmail/kmail.pdf
> > > 
> > > The logo looks borked on my side, what happend to the KMail Icon?
> > > There should be a scalable version of the Oxygen icon, no? Seems
> > > certainly more suitable than toy figures.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards, Myriam
> > 
> > Ok. So is it suitable to make the rules as follows:
> > 
> > 1. The application logo if it exists.
> > 2. The Oxygen logo for the applications without logos and KCMs.
> > 
> fine for me.
> 
> -- 
> Burkhard Lück

Ok. Now all PDFs should have an application icon on the frontpage and KDE logo if the application does not have an icon.

Hope I did not break too much and everything will be online on the next Friday. Not all PDFs for icons are ready now but I will try to have a complete set as soon as possible (any help will be appreciated).

Best regards,
Yuri