[kde-doc-english] Entities

[Lauri Watts]

On Wednesday 20 July 2005 00.15, Francis Giannaros wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a policy on 3rd-party KDE applications and entities? I noticed
> that Konversation, amaroK and a few others don't have their respective
> entities and <application> is used instead; for example, in the userguide.
> Noticed however that apps like KPackage and others do have one in
> general.entities
>
> Should things in extragear etc. have entities or should we just use
> <application> for those?

There's no reason those apps that are being maintained in extragears can't 
have entities in general.entities

The only consideration is that the apps themselves may not want to 
additionally define it in their own doc, so that they are not dependent on a 
current version of kdelibs. 

For this specific example, amaroK and Konversation are very popular, integrate 
with other KDE apps, and are likely to be mentioned in other docs (the user 
guide, for instance) so putting those two in kdelibs would be a good idea.

Regards,
-- 
Lauri Watts
KDE Documentation: http://docs.kde.org
KDE on FreeBSD: http://freebsd.kde.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20050720/4d8a3538/attachment.sig