[kde-doc-english] Documentation feedback

[Philip Rodrigues]

> But KHelpCenter is more interesting I think, since it is more used. If you
> implemented the feedback as a describing, descrete paragraph with a link to
> bugs.kde.org, it should probably be implemented in the XSLT customization.
> In either case, that's probably the best place.

Two things to emphasize here:
1. A description of exactly what is out-of-date/missing/incorrect should be 
*required* - I don't think "Was this helpful? Yes/No" gives us enough 
information.
2. We're already trying to do this sort of thing on bugs.kde.org - take a look 
at the 'docs' product. Anything new should be integrated with this.

Also, bear in mind that we're quite short-handed in the docs team, so any new 
technology should concentrate on allowing us to make the best use of our time 
(Or, of course, on attracting and keeping new writers).

Regards,
Philip
-- 
KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
KDE Documentation Online: http://docs.kde.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20050123/263abb6a/attachment.sig