[kde-doc-english]kdegraphics/kdvi

[Éric Bischoff]

On Wednesday 17 April 2002 11:03, Thomas Diehl wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 17. April 2002 10:04 schrieb Éric Bischoff:
> > > If we start fixing all the "small things that would make another thing
> > > clearer" we would invite the addition of tons of new strings.
> >
> > OK. But in the same message I report two "real mistakes" :
> > - "paper.dvi" instead of "paper.tex"
> > - a missing separator in the command line syntax
>
> Yes, this were the ones I had in mind when talking about "fixing broken
> links" and the like.

OK.

> > Does it mean that, when I report doc problems, I should classify between
> > "cosmetical, markup & usability" and "misleading & error"?
>
> This is what I would suggest. New strings should only be introduced to the
> branch if there are really important fixes.

Fine with me. Thanks for the clarification, Thomas.