Improving KDE Plasma Performance on Low-Resource Systems

[Lost Nebula]

17 Ağu 2026 Pzt 10:13 tarihinde Lost Nebula <lost.nebula.mail at gmail.com>
şunu yazdı:

>
>
> Dear KDE developers,
>
> I know that GNOME and KDE Plasma are modern and feature-rich desktop
> environments. However, I believe that performance and resource efficiency
> should receive much more attention in the future, especially for low-end
> computers and tablets.
>
> My system is a good example of this problem: **an Intel Atom Z3735
> processor, 1 GB of physical RAM, 1 GB of ZRAM, and 1 GB of disk swap**.
> Even with 1 GB of ZRAM and an additional 1 GB of disk swap, running GNOME
> or KDE Plasma puts an extremely heavy load on the system.
>
> The biggest problem is that the system starts struggling even before I can
> comfortably open a basic application such as a web browser. Opening another
> application while the desktop environment is running, using multiple
> applications, or simply running a modern web browser can make the system
> extremely slow. The hardware itself is not completely unusable, but the
> user experience becomes very difficult: applications take a long time to
> open, the system becomes slow to respond, and stability problems can
> sometimes occur.
>
> I am not asking GNOME or KDE to abandon their modern features. Instead, I
> believe it would be extremely useful if these desktop environments offered
> **much more aggressive performance optimizations and dedicated low-resource
> modes**.
>
> For example:
>
> * Reducing idle RAM usage as much as possible,
> * Reducing unnecessary background processes,
> * Automatically reducing animations and visual effects in a low-resource
> mode,
> * More aggressively optimizing memory usage,
> * Ensuring that the desktop itself consumes as few resources as possible
> when RAM is limited,
> * Reducing CPU usage on older and low-power Atom processors,
> * Improving resource sharing between the desktop environment and user
> applications under low-memory conditions,
> * Providing a genuine **"Low Resource / Performance Mode"** that users can
> enable without having to manually configure dozens of settings.
>
> These improvements would be extremely valuable.
>
> In my opinion, low resource consumption is not important only for old
> computers. **Resource efficiency should always be an important design
> goal.** Using less RAM and CPU means better responsiveness, less swap
> activity, lower power consumption, less heat, and potentially longer
> battery life. It also allows the operating system to remain usable on a
> much wider range of hardware.
>
> A device with 1 GB of RAM may seem extremely old or insignificant today,
> but there are still millions of low-end computers, tablets, educational
> devices, and older systems in use around the world. Instead of completely
> excluding these devices simply because their hardware is limited, making
> them usable with an efficient Linux desktop environment would be a
> significant advantage for the Linux ecosystem.
>
> On my system, even **1 GB of RAM + 1 GB of ZRAM + 1 GB of disk swap** is
> not enough to comfortably run the desktop environment together with
> everyday applications. The fact that the system already struggles before I
> can even comfortably open a web browser demonstrates how critical desktop
> environment resource consumption is on devices with very limited RAM.
>
> For this reason, I would strongly encourage the GNOME and KDE teams to
> place greater emphasis on performance improvements, reducing memory
> consumption, and improving stability on low-specification systems.
>
> Modern features and visual improvements are certainly important, but
> **being able to run a desktop environment smoothly, reliably, and with the
> lowest possible resource consumption should be considered just as
> important, if not one of the fundamental priorities.**
>
> I hope to see serious performance and resource-efficiency improvements
> that can make GNOME and KDE genuinely usable on low-end systems.
>
> Thank you for your work and for considering this feedback.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20260817/1f3482c2/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1000167677.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 3149679 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20260817/1f3482c2/attachment-0001.jpg>