Disallow or discourage use of "AI" tools (Christoph Cullmann)

[Christoph Cullmann]

Hi,


On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 09:12, Albert Vaca Cintora <albertvaka at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 18 May 2025, 08:59 Justin Zobel, <justin at 1707.io> wrote:
> 

> > If the contributor cannot tell you the license(s) of the code that was used to generate the code, then it's literally gambling that this code wasn't taken from another project by Gemini and used without their permission or used in a way that violates the license and opens up the KDE e.V. to litigation.
> 

> 

> I'm no lawyer but I would expect that training AI will fall under fair use of copyrighted code. If that's not the case already, it will probably be soon. The benefits of AI to society are too large to autoimpose such a roadblock.
> 



if that would happen, then there is just no copyright protection anymore and all is fair game, I highly doubt that,
but yes, that is what companies that want to get rich with deep learning want to have. 

Greetings
Christoph
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20250518/e4591f91/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 343 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20250518/e4591f91/attachment.sig>