CI Flatpak Builds

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Freitag, 24. Januar 2025 18:57:43 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Ben Cooksley 
wrote:
> I had been thinking that having a separate file that would be used instead
> of .flatpak-manifest.yml if present when doing a build on a stable branch
> would be a good solution.
> Under this you would have a .flatpak-manifest.yml and a
> .flatpak-manifest-stable.yml file
> 
> When building on master the .flatpak-manifest.yml file would be used, but
> when on a release branch / tag the .flatpak-manifest-stable.yml file would
> be used instead (if present).
> 
> That would eliminate needing the release manager / developer to update
> .flatpak-manifest.yml on branching a new stable release branch.

Doesn't that mean that the .flatpak-manifest-stable.yml file would be completely 
untested until the branching happens? We all know what happens if things are 
not tested on a regular basis.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20250124/a3f18223/attachment.sig>