KDE Gear projects with failing CI (master) (11 February 2025)

[Alexander Semke]

On 12/02/25 09:25, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:02 PM Alexander Semke
> <alexander.semke at web.de> wrote:
>
>     On 12/02/25 00:41, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>     > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing
>     CI jobs on
>     > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing
>     for multiple
>     > reasons.
>     >
>     > Good news: 1 repository was fixed
>     >
>     > Bad news: 1 repository started failing, 1 is still failing
>     >
>     >
>     > cantor - 3rd week - LAST WEEK BEFORE TEST REMOVAL
>     >   * https://invent.kde.org/education/cantor/-/pipelines/884127
>     >    * testmaxima fails
>
>     I'm looking into this problem now. It's working locally without any
>     problems and there were no code changes in in Cantor's repository
>     in the
>     last weeks.
>
>
>     On CI maxima fails to start with|
>     |
>
>     |fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 5186 tid 5186:\ncore was
>     built for
>     runtime \"hostname-id-1735813044\" but this is
>     \"hostname-id-1736350757\"|
>
>     |
>     |
>
>     This seems to be a build issue in Tumbleweed.
>
>
>     Ben, was a new image created three weeks ago which can explain why
>     these
>     tests started to fail? I assume this problem is already fixed in
>     Tumbleweed. Any chance to pull the new versions of maxima and
>     maxima-exec-sbcl?
>
>
> The SUSE image was re-generated a week ago - see
> https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-images/-/jobs (Finished tab, then
> search for the image you are looking for)
>
> Comparing vs. the latest build logs for Maxima on the OBS (
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/maxima ->
> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/maxima/standard/x86_64
> ) it looks like there has been a version bump.
>
> I've triggered
> https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-images/-/jobs/2552969 now.
>
Thanks Ben. Seems to work now. Can you please also update the qt69 image?


--

Alexander