New Application Status

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2024 10:27:13 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit Ben 
Cooksley wrote:
> Trying to coming full circle on this here, but in summary sounds like there
> are a couple of things to change going forward:
> 
> * For apps.kde.org, we should flag applications in accordance with their
> Lifecycle status in the metadata (ie. unmaintained and those yet to pass
> KDE Review should be flagged in some form or another)

Yes. For beta apps. I'd say for unmaintained apps there shouldn't be a page on 
apps.kde.org. Given that there won't be build artifacts for unmaintained apps 
(at least not for long) there is anyway no AppStream data for creating such a 
page.

> * We should institute tighter controls regarding releases of applications
> and ensuring projects pass KDE Review first

Make that "stable releases". For good reasons our lifecycle policy explicitly 
allows unstable releases for Playground projects (but not for incubated 
projects).

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-devel/attachments/20241205/885b7e6e/attachment.sig>