Progress is good for us but bad for documentation

[Frederik Schwarzer]

On 6/9/21 6:02 PM, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 9. Juni 2021, 01:20:23 CEST schrieb Frederik Schwarzer:
>> I would like to ask you to report such documentation to me. We see the
>> topic come up here and there but it then sometimes sinks into oblivion
>> again because it was part of a merge request that has then been merged
>> or so.
>> [...]
>> So what to report? Documentation that ...
>> - explains outdated technology or concepts like KDE 4 or HAL.
>> - has holes in it. For example a tutorial where you suddenly think,
>>     you skipped an important step.
>> - you wish was there but you could not find it.
> 
> Is this an effort with universal scope, or is there a limit?
> Obviously you are at least talking about the wikis. Are you also (at the
> current time) talking about other websites and/or application handbooks?

It is meant as an open question. All answers welcome. Of course not 
everything can be worked on now. But compiling a list of stuff to work 
on will help pushing and coordinating the work.

heers,
Frederik