knoopix tool using qt/Win Free Edition@freenet.de

Simon Rutishauser simon.rutishauser at web.de
Tue Mar 22 21:08:59 CET 2005


On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:01:32PM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Steven Boothe wrote:
> 
> >But how would we go about reclaiming the qtwin project space in SF? Or 
> >would it be feasible to use a different name like qtwin32 or something 
> >just to start fresh? Actually it would be preferable to keep qtwin if 
> >possible in the event that we are faced with the opportunity for a 
> >64-bit option in the future(!?). :)
> 
> if it's impossible to get this name we could also use
> qtwinfree
> qtwingpl
> qt-win
> 
> To be fully open for the  future I prefer this:
> qtnt (not trolltech)
> maybe it's sometimes necessary to add non windows code
> to a code basis not controlled by trolltech.

I think this sounds too much like Qt for (Windows) NT. I think for the
moment qtwin is best.

Simon


More information about the kde-cygwin mailing list