Thu, 19 Oct 2000 17:35:09 +0200
Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Harri Porten wrote:
> > CVS by ettrich wrote:
> > >
> > > kdebase/kwin eventsrc,1.61,1.62
> > > Author: ettrich
> > > Thu Oct 19 15:05:39 UTC 2000
> > >
> > > Modified Files:
> > > eventsrc
> > > Log Message:
> > > better
> > Too bad this won't be released before March ;)
> > Harri.
> > P.S. Sorry. Couldn't resist. But don't think I'm desperate enough to
> > become pessismistic yet. We'll somehow get this going.
> We knew KDE 2.0 wouldn't be perfect before, didn't we?
Yes. And I despite that I'm still fine with releasing it now. It doesn't
> But it didn't kill us after KDE 1.0 to do a 1.1 and 1.1.1 and a
> 1.1.2 either. In all of them went major changes and each one had
> known bugs.
I admit that this is true. But I'd rather see comparable releases like
1.1.2 for 2.0 too. And 1.1. did take a bit long didn't it. That's a
point were we could try to improve.
> After all we can release KDE 2.1 whenever we think it fits and
> it's more stable than 2.0. If KDE 2.0 is really that buggy if
> you seem to think it is, then this will be early.
I'm not worried so much about the stability of 2.0 but of 2.1 during the
development cycle !