Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:59:47 -0700
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 07:15:33PM +0000, David Faure wrote:
> Yup, but I mentionned the fact that I could validate all of if EXCEPT
> the kio_http part. First the change is huge, and second, I don't know much
> in that area.
> Now that this pops up, it seems obvious that this should NOT have been
> removed, though.
Without actually looking at the code again.. it appears as if HAVE_SSL and
DO_SSL mean the same thing, right? If not, then your patch is incorrect
IMO, as it reports that it supports (hey it rhymes?) HTTPS even if it's
not using the SSL equipped slave.