Stable branches, including frameworks for Kubuntu LTS

2Albert Astals Cid aacid at kde.org
Tue May 12 21:45:10 BST 2026


El dimarts, 12 de maig del 2026, a les 20:13:01 (Hora d’estiu d’Europa 
central), Marco Martin va escriure:
> On Tue, May 12, 2026, 18:15 Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> > We (as in Techpaladin) pledge to take up the maintenance of such branch as
> > long as it's supported, managing backports, testing and releases, as well
> > as keeping the new CI nodes green
> 
> What do you think about it? Is something that looks sensible on the
> upstream/community point of view?

Apologies if the next question sounds a bit blunt I didn't figure out how word 
it in a somewhat better way.

Is this something we want to pretend the community is doing?

That is, do we want to try to make this "a KDE thing" or is it clearly 
structured as a Techpaladin/Kubuntu Focus thing?

For me the second option makes it "simpler".

Then my suggestion would be to just create "vendor" branches like the ones 
that we have for example in kleopatra/mimetreeparser/friends

  gpg4win/23.10
  gpg4win/24.05
  gpg4win/gpd-5.0
  gpg4win/gpd-5.1

So create something like kubuntufocus/26.04

Maybe it would even make sense to create such branches for KDE Plasma 6.6 
(after final 6.6.6 is released) and KDE Gear 25.12?

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> --
> Marco Martin






More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list