KDE Review Request: Keep Secret

[Ben Cooksley]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 11:01 PM Vlad Zahorodnii <vlad.zahorodnii at kde.org>
wrote:

> On 8/19/25 1:42 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Several weeks are passed and most of the checklist points are complete
> > (neon, snap and windows packages are missing from the checklist, i
> > think i'll need help with those?)
>
> FWIW with knighttime, I filed a bugzilla bug report about it and also
> poked neon folks on Matrix.
>
> As many people pointed out in the past, maybe we could change that
> requirement in favor of KDE Linux.
>

Seems a bit strange to play favourites in favour of one distribution over
another - I can understand Flatpak / Snap, but surely specific distros
should not be favoured?


>
> Regards,
> Vlad
>

Thanks,
Ben


>
> >
> > Any other blockers to move it in Applications?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 3:22 PM Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have been working over the last months on an application called Keep
> Secret.
> >> It is intended to be a password manager gui which uses the Secret
> >> Service DBus api
> >> as backend, therefore it works with KWallet, gnome-keyring, oo7 etc..
> >>
> >> The current home is:
> >>
> >> https://invent.kde.org/mart/keepsecret
> >>
> >> It can be tested by having any secret service set up (or just secret
> >> service enabled in the KWallet config.
> >>
> >> I've added a kdereview issue here:
> >> https://invent.kde.org/mart/keepsecret/-/issues/1
> >>
> >> The final place for this should be i think in gear, under kdeutils?
> >>
> >> did i miss something?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marco Martin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20250820/5c801160/attachment.htm>