sentry evaluation

[Albert Astals Cid]

El dijous, 1 de juny de 2023, a les 12:35:41 (CEST), Harald Sitter va 
escriure:
> Hey,
> 
> We've had almost a year, albeit in a super limited capacity for git
> builds, with sentry (https://errors-eval.kde.org) and we should
> probably render a final verdict on the evaluation.
> 
> Did you like it?

Did I miss the email announcing this?

I can only see a "Towards Excellent Defect Management" sent 2 years ago that 
describes a plan, but i can't see any kind of "You can join sentry to do this 
and that".

By clicking on https://errors-eval.kde.org i can't really seem to see anything 
to evaluate either, all it deos is it asks me to join a team.

Cheers,
  Albert

> What could be improved?
> Should we move ahead with a more permanent setup?
> 
> The overall game plan would be to have drkonqi ask the user to opt
> into automatic crash submission when they open drkonqi so we get close
> to all crashes (the ones caught by kcrash) automatically filed into
> sentry from then on out. To increase exposure of this feature I'd also
> like to glue it into the feedback KCM but I'm not yet sure if it
> should be a separate setting or linked to the regular feedback
> categories, the former sounds more accessible. The current bugzilla
> based workflow would still be available for when the user actually
> wants to write a description.
> 
> (previous discussion: https://markmail.org/thread/6y5paczdposz3aoj)
> 
> HS