Kandalf: request for review

[Nicolas Fella]

On 12/8/23 00:49, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El divendres, 8 de desembre de 2023, a les 0:44:11 (CET), Carl Schwan va
> escriure:
>> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023, at 12:10 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>>> El dijous, 7 de desembre de 2023, a les 16:28:48 (CET), Loren Burkholder
>>> va
>>>
>>> escriure:
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>
>>>> I've been working towards getting Kandalf ready for integration into KDE
>>>> (and I'd like to thank everyone who has pitched in to help me, mainly
>>>> Laurent and redstrate). At this point, while the app is not necessarily
>>>> feature-complete or fully polished, it's getting close to that point.
>>>> Therefore, I'd like to officially request a review of Kandalf for
>>>> inclusion
>>>> in the KDE apps.
>>> Where is the thing we're supposed to review?
>> In the wrong place:https://invent.kde.org/lorendb/kandalf/-/issues/1
> And again we have people self-checking the checkboxes or their own review
> :sad_dance:
To be fair, nowhere in
https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle#kdereview does
it say who is supposed to check what box, so people checking "obvious"
boxes like "It has a passing CI build" themselves isn't that far off.
>> I asked Loren to create a sysadmin ticket to get it moved to an offical
>> namespace.
>>
>> That seems premature? What if the review never succeeds?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20231208/5b1e6f94/attachment-0001.htm>