Towards Excellent Defect Management

[Ben Cooksley]

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:06 AM Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:

> El dimarts, 14 de setembre de 2021, a les 20:35:40 (CEST), Ben Cooksley va
> escriure:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 5:35 AM Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> >
> > > El dimarts, 14 de setembre de 2021, a les 17:23:01 (CEST), Harald
> Sitter
> > > va escriure:
> > > > It is  practically free software as far as we are concerned
> > >
> > > I guess this means it's not actually Free Software?
> > >
> >
> > Please see https://open.sentry.io/licensing/
> >
> > The tl;dr is that the license it is provided under (BSL 1.1) is not OSI
> > approved due to the restriction on it's use by cloud vendors (ie. it has
> an
> > anti-AWS clause).
> > That restriction lapses after 36 months, at which point it is Apache 2.0
> > compatible.
> >
> > Based on what Harald has written earlier, it looks like Sentry is the
> only
> > suitable game in town for what we need - the only question is whether we
> > are happy to make use of BSL 1.1 licensed software given that we have
> > traditionally only deployed 100% open source software to our systems
> (which
> > is why we use Gitlab CE over Gitlab EE)
>
> Oh i feel we already discussed this in the past, right?
>
> Sorry for bringing it up again then :)
>

I've checked my mail archives and there was a public discussion regarding
Sentry/BSL earlier yes - however it didn't reach a conclusion, it was
deferred to a BoF.
That was for server/infrastructure event monitoring as well, rather than
crash handling.


> Cheers,
>   Albert
>

Cheers,
Ben


> >
> >
> > > Cheers,
> > >   Albert
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Cheers,
> > Ben
> >
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20210915/9fa1cfe1/attachment.htm>