Proposing Quick Charts as a new framework

[Arjen Hiemstra]

On 09-09-2019 10:24, Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 3:59 PM Arjen Hiemstra <ahiemstra at heimr.nl>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 06-09-2019 02:49, Aleix Pol wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:53 PM Arjen Hiemstra
>> <ahiemstra at heimr.nl>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On 02-09-2019 19:26, Luigi Toscano wrote:
>>>>> Arjen Hiemstra ha scritto:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> That's actually a good point, though the kf5 is only in the
>> repository
>>>> name, I
>>>> name it "Quick Charts" everywhere else. Which is probably a good
>>>> reason
>>>> to have
>>>> the repo name changed in the first place. :) Originally, I put
>> kf5 in
>>>> the repo
>>>> name because that's what is used once installed as part of
>> Frameworks,
>>>> but I
>>>> agree that it can lead to confusing things.
>>> 
>>> It should be called kquickchart (which indeed is far too similar
>> to
>>> kqtquickcharts). Much like you use KF5CoreAddons, but the
>> repository
>>> is called kcoreaddons.
>> 
>> To be fair, KCoreAddons is called KCoreAddons in its documentation,
>> so
>> it
>> does not seem to be called "CoreAddons". At the same time, there are
>> 
>> plenty
>> of Frameworks that do not start with a K, like Solid, Prison or
>> BluezQt.
>> So I do not really see why it should be "kquickcharts".
> 
> Just my 2 cents:
> 
> The reason is consistency. Don't underestimate consistency. We have
> done naming mistakes from time to time, but that should not imply
> we should do it again.
> 
> +1 for KQuickCharts, names do matter.

At the same time, I could argue that we are trying to move away from k-
names in applications and might want to do the same for other parts of
KDE. But let's not argue semantics, if people insist on kquickcharts I
will change it to kquickcharts.

> 
> Best regards
> Dominik