Review Request 128684: Proofread + update khtml-general kcm docbook

[Christoph Feck]

> On Aug. 16, 2016, 9:05 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > doc/kcontrol/khtml-general/index.docbook, line 51
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128684/diff/1/?file=474210#file474210line51>
> >
> >     Well, qt5-webkit and kwebkitpart do still exist. They're just not really maintained (but then again that is a problem for konqueror itself as well, especially due to being built on top of deprecated web engines...). (I hate this situation.)
> 
> Burkhard Lück wrote:
>     Thanks to your hints I just detected that kwebkitpart has a frameworks branch. Building this branch I get the webkit engine back in konqueror kf5.
>     But kwebkitpart frameworks branch is unreleased, stable/released branch is 1.3 kde4 based, master as well.
>     So should I update the docbooks for konqueror with kwebkitpart/frameworks branch?
> 
> Burkhard Lück wrote:
>     > So should I update the docbooks for konqueror with kwebkitpart/frameworks branch?
>     
>     kde-doc-english: please comment/answer my question
>     thanks
> 
> Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
>     +1
> 
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
>     The kwerbkitpart is under construction, and there may be a qwebengine part instead or in addition. I would leave that part commented with a reminder to revisit it before the documentation freeze.
> 
> Burkhard Lück wrote:
>     Let's do it the other way round, leave kwebkitpart for now and revisit before documentation freeze. 
>     That we we get the konqueror except the kwebkit related stuff immediately up to date and have minimal changes for now.
> 
> Burkhard Lück wrote:
>     in https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368705#c1 Christoph says:
>      
>      "Konqueror and the WebKit part will be released as Qt5 versions starting with KDE Applications 16.12 release."
>      
>      so we should stick with the kwebkitpart for now

Sorry, I was too fast. kwebkitpart is in extragear, so it will not be automatically released.


- Christoph


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128684/#review98408
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 15, 2016, 1:40 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128684/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 15, 2016, 1:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, KDE Base Apps, Plasma, and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-desktop
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> proofread + update
> comment webkit
> 
> code in kde-baseapps - docbook in plasma-desktop?
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   doc/kcontrol/khtml-general/index.docbook 1b9c80e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128684/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> passes checkXML5
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20160914/16525f79/attachment.htm>