Review Request 122227: KRecursiveFilterProxyModel: many many more unittests, and fixing what they found.
Christian Mollekopf
chrigi_1 at fastmail.fm
Mon Jan 26 07:48:05 GMT 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122227/#review74744
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
I tested this over the weekend. It fixes the problem originally addressed and seems to fix the crash I was having.
- Christian Mollekopf
On Jan. 23, 2015, 6:11 p.m., David Faure wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122227/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 23, 2015, 6:11 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs and Christian Mollekopf.
>
>
> Repository: kdelibs
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> 1) setData(false), i.e. a dataChanged that removes and item from the filter,
> didn't actually lead to removal. The code was only looking at changing to
> get in, not changing to get out.
>
> 2) On insertion, we can avoid emitting dataChanged up the chain, by
> finding out before the insertion which exact ancestor will be changed
> (lastHiddenAscendantForInsert).
>
> 3) On removal, well simplify the code (completeRemove was always true, unless
> ignoreRemove was set, so we only need to keep ignoreRemove), and avoid
> emitting dataChanged up the chain, by finding out which the last parent
> before one that should still be visible, and hide just that one.
>
> 4) While at it, an obvious optimization that could have been done
> since day one: filterAcceptsRow can return true as soon as a child wants
> to be shown.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> kdeui/itemviews/krecursivefilterproxymodel.cpp efa286ad87ded962b20c8a581b659d1b154ebf3a
> kdeui/tests/krecursivefilterproxymodeltest.cpp 3bcb72980730cb22f887ae8fa5fbd91b5609aeb6
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122227/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Unittest, obviously.
> + KMail smoke testing.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Faure
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150126/8a439b92/attachment.htm>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list