Review Request 121831: libksysguard: process.h: encapsulate private fields

[Gregor Mi]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated Jan. 12, 2015, 2:30 p.m.)


Review request for KDE Base Apps and John Tapsell.


Changes
-------

question about C++ macros


Repository: libksysguard


Description (updated)
-------

In process.h there are several public fields. I propose to encapsulate the private fields with getter methods. I implemented it exemplary for the fields 'login', 'uid' and 'euid'.


(In a separate commit I would add the .reviewboardrc file)

What is the current policy on using small C++ macros as done in this RR? Use it (code is more compact and readable) or don't use it (better for debugging)?


Diffs
-----

  processcore/process.h 85a3a13388c44f768040dbc6602ab3211edd5b21 
  .reviewboardrc PRE-CREATION 
  processcore/processes_linux_p.cpp 0cff0e8b407a087dc29f755b12ea3d784ba34e6a 
  processui/ProcessFilter.cpp ec520593fb67c777d56817f2493d40dc5ade0347 
  processui/ProcessModel.cpp 3acf52b92f4a8ca054d88aad1ec6b31f4a31f297 
  processui/scripting.h 2445c0ab0d81af3283c0f6e9c5f349a3d70b0de9 
  processcore/process.cpp 190f4902fa6f3bae2d8b60dbf1a43be71beb1820 

Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121831/diff/


Testing
-------

Compiles and runs. Data is still shown. No error.


Thanks,

Gregor Mi

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150112/1cd70627/attachment.htm>