Review Request 121717: libksysguard/processtable: Add new column "Relative Start Time"

[Albert Astals Cid]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/#review73714
-----------------------------------------------------------



processcore/process.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/#comment51308>

    initialize to 0 in the constructor?


- Albert Astals Cid


On gen. 9, 2015, 10:25 a.m., Gregor Mi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated gen. 9, 2015, 10:25 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Base Apps and John Tapsell.
> 
> 
> Repository: libksysguard
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This will add a new column "Relative Start Time" which shows how much time has elapsed since the process was started.
> 
> Some details:
> - add new heading with default location between "Shared Memory" and "Command" and not visible by default
> - define What's this
> - define Tooltip
> - define sorting
> - add class TimeUtil with methods:
>   - systemUptimeSeconds
>   - systemUptimeAbsolute
>   - secondsToHumanElapsedString (for this one a unit test was added, see chronotest.cpp)
> 
> This code reformatting goes in separate commits:
> - ProcessModel.cpp: reformat code: consistent number of linebreaks between method definitions (1 blank line)
> - ProcessModel.h: reformat code: split long enum line into separte lines for better diffing
> 
> Side note on sorting:
> I was wondering if the sorting of the PID column is exactly the same as with the new "Relative Start Time" column. When testing on my computer it was. But according to this post one cannot generally assume that sorting by PID will reflect the relative start order of the processes: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/822797/about-the-pid-of-the-process
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   processcore/process.h 85a3a13388c44f768040dbc6602ab3211edd5b21 
>   processui/ksysguardprocesslist.cpp 894e9a4d42112e01e742f1b0a2bcd6be7a844258 
>   processui/timeutil.h PRE-CREATION 
>   tests/CMakeLists.txt 0fb3ab620564abf09f82d1609fc464d5597b2bd3 
>   tests/chronotest.h PRE-CREATION 
>   tests/chronotest.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   processcore/process.cpp 190f4902fa6f3bae2d8b60dbf1a43be71beb1820 
>   processcore/processes_linux_p.cpp 0cff0e8b407a087dc29f755b12ea3d784ba34e6a 
>   processui/ProcessModel.h a338536023f9d003a44bcb8420b9288f8673ea92 
>   processui/ProcessModel.cpp 3acf52b92f4a8ca054d88aad1ec6b31f4a31f297 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Run ksysguard, show new column, sort in both directions.
> 
> Minor issue: as the seconds pass the values in the new column will not be updated automatically unless there is some user interaction (like mouse hovering/moving or sorting).
> 
> New unit test passes.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gregor Mi
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150110/b39592f7/attachment.htm>