Changes to our Git infrastructure

Albert Astals Cid aacid at
Mon Jan 5 22:52:33 GMT 2015

El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 23:46:18, Alexander Neundorf va 
> On Monday, January 05, 2015 22:35:23 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 22:22:19, Boudewijn Rempt va 
> ...
> > > * figured out what branches are for, and how different projects handle
> > > those
> > 
> > Right, that's hardly documentable though (and will get old soon most
> > probably)
> this is IMO one of the main issues. This really should be documented, and
> ideally should be consistent for all "KDE" repositories. And this policy
> also shouldn't change often.
> How to deal with branches "correctly", i.e. how the project maintainers
> expect it, is a big part what can make using git hard.

But that hasn't changed since svn, no? (Not saying it's good or bad, just 
saying i don't see this is a difference in git)


> E.g. using git for cmake is easier, because there the workflow (how to
> branch etc.) is fully documented.
> Alex

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list