Review Request 122556: Bump Qt version to 5.4

[Frank Reininghaus]

> On Feb. 13, 2015, 10:39 nachm., Marko Käning wrote:
> > I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's possible.
> 
> Inge Wallin wrote:
>     +1. Depending on 5.4 in applications already is bad enough even though it can sometimes be necessary but I am against it for our base stuff. Especially in this case where there is a workaround.

Note that nothing from the "frameworks" branch in kde-baseapps has been released yet. OTOH, Qt 5.4 was released more than 2 months ago. Is it likely that any distro will ship stuff that is released from kde-baseapps/frameworks at some point in the future, but still stick to Qt 5.3?


- Frank


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review76012
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 13, 2015, 8:06 vorm., Arjun AK wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 8:06 vorm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Base Apps.
> 
> 
> Repository: kde-baseapps
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> `QUrl::fromUserInput(userInput, workingDirectory, UserInputResolutionOptions options)` seems to be Qt 5.4+. We either need to bump requirement to 5.4 or do what kompare [did](https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdesdk/kompare/repository/revisions/master/entry/libdialogpages/diffpage.cpp#L45)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 6df9015 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Arjun AK
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20150214/81c46cd9/attachment.htm>