Using nullptr instead of Q_NULLPTR

[Thomas Lübking]

On Freitag, 14. August 2015 22:34:28 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote:

> Don't do that. If you use nullptr, there's no going back to 
> zero because it's 
> not the same. You've irrevocably locked yourself into requiring a compiler 
> that supports it.

Even if it's only been used in a 0x0 "compliant" way?
Some ABI trap?

In that case there's not much to discuss, is there?
KF5 "now" requires a compiler that support nullptr.

Regards,
Thomas