Using nullptr instead of Q_NULLPTR
thomas.luebking at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 21:49:44 BST 2015
On Freitag, 14. August 2015 22:34:28 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Don't do that. If you use nullptr, there's no going back to
> zero because it's
> not the same. You've irrevocably locked yourself into requiring a compiler
> that supports it.
Even if it's only been used in a 0x0 "compliant" way?
Some ABI trap?
In that case there's not much to discuss, is there?
KF5 "now" requires a compiler that support nullptr.
More information about the kde-core-devel