Updating our tools

[Allen Winter]

On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 10:38:37 AM Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Allen,
> 
> Thanks for fixing this, I think it will be a useful tool to check our
> existing frameworks and code based on frameworks with. I'll update the
> techbase pages myself.
> 
The Krazy check for frameworks should be good to go now.
Please notify me if you find encounter issues no longer relevant in Qt5/KDE5.

> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Allen Winter <winter at kde.org> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 04:15:27 PM Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> >> Albert,
> >>
> >> I can take a look at it if someone points me in the right direction. I
> >> also found this:
> >> http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/frameworks-5.x/kdelibs/knewstuff/index.html
> >> which seems to check the right way for frameworks suggestions, but it
> >> hasn't been ran since Dec of last year :/ and also it calls the
> >> frameworks kdelibs still (or at least puts it in the url) So it seems
> >> krazy can handle this new set of suggestions (maybe it could use some
> >> tweaks though) but hasn't been ran in quite some time. How do I get
> >> access to run it more often, etc.
> >>
> >
> > Yes that's all on my plate.
> > I have it on my todo list.
> > Krazy should be kde5 ready , I just need to plug it in and turn it on.
> >
> > I don't recall if there were any blockers, or if I simply got distracted on something else.
> >
> > The associated changes to the techbase documentation is not on my radar.
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> wrote:
> >> > El Dimarts, 23 de setembre de 2014, a les 15:56:58, Jeremy Whiting va
> >> > escriure:
> >> >> Hello all,
> >> >>
> >> >> Since some of our applications and our workspace will be updated for
> >> >> the next major release (14.12 is the name iirc) to use Qt5 and KDE
> >> >> Frameworks I thought I would check englishbreakfastnetwork.org code
> >> >> checker of kanagram (which has master branch based on qt5 and kf5).
> >> >> http://ebn.kde.org/krazy/reports/kde-4.x/kdeedu/kanagram/index.html
> >> >> Some of the "issues" on krazy are old and point to techbase articles
> >> >> suggesting the opposite of the kf5 porting notes, For example, krazy
> >> >> suggests we should use KLineEdit instead of QLineEdit but the porting
> >> >> notes suggest to port from KLineEdit to QLineEdit since KLineEdit is
> >> >> to be deprecated. Maybe I just missed something on ebn, but do we need
> >> >> to add another category there for kf5 based code to be checked in a
> >> >> different way with different rules, etc.? Shouldn't we update pages
> >> >> like https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/API_to_Avoid to reflect new
> >> >> suggestions also I guess or split them to contain suggestions for
> >> >> kdelibs4 based code vs kf5 based code?
> >> >
> >> > We totally should, now who is going to do it ;)
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> >   Albert
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> thanks,
> >> >> Jeremy
> >> >