Moving repositories in the module structure

Ben Cooksley bcooksley at
Sat Oct 4 08:21:43 BST 2014

On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Víctor Blázquez
<victor.blazquez at> wrote:
> I'm sorry for doing the move that fast, I should have realized it was sent
> only to plasma-devel

No worries - in virtually all cases it is fine to process requests
when we receive them.

> Víctor Blázquez


> On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Aleix Pol <aleixpol at> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> It seems there has been a recent outbreak of repository moves which
>>> have been extremely poorly co-ordinated by those doing the requests.
>>> In addition, it is actually a requirement that modules moving from
>>> Extragear into (what was at least) the SC need to re-transit through
>>> KDE Review.It is also considered proper practice to at least inform
>>> the translation, documentation and release  teams in advance you
>>> intend to make these moves - something which has also been neglected.
>>> For all further repository structure moves - please ensure you have
>>> received the appropriate consent from the above mentioned teams, and
>>> have announced them on the appropriate mailing lists in advance.
>>> @Plasma team: plasma-devel at does not constitute an appropriate
>>> mailing list, as it is not a community wide development mailing list.
>>> Only kde-devel and kde-core-devel qualify for this.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben Cooksley
>>> KDE Sysadmin
>> My apologies, I shouldn't have rushed into doing such moves and send
>> e-mails to all the interested parties.
>> If someone considers it appropriate, I can roll some of the changes back.
>> Aleix

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list