Review Request 116784: Fix incorrect use of KDateTime.toTime_t in kio_http

[David Jarvie]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116784/#review52940
-----------------------------------------------------------



kioslave/http/http.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116784/#comment37258>

    Need to convert to UTC first, since it will produce the wrong value if it's in some random time zone:
    dt.toUtc().dateTime()


- David Jarvie


On March 13, 2014, 12:49 p.m., Dawit Alemayehu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116784/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 13, 2014, 12:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs, Andreas Hartmetz and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdelibs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The attached patch does the following:
> 
> - It corrects a mistake in assumption that KDateTime.toTime_t() will return -1 for invalidate dates. It does not. The result is an overflow which is interpreted in kio_http as a timestamp in the distant future which obviously is wrong. See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331774 for example. This assumption also affects the timestamp variables used for cache management.
> 
> - It converts cache management timestamp variables to 64 bits so they can accomodates dates beyond Feb 7, 2106.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kioslave/http/http.h dd85622 
>   kioslave/http/http.cpp e4f1eba 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116784/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dawit Alemayehu
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20140314/1d11bdd4/attachment.htm>