Review Request 119447: meinproc: check both result of parsing and validation

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119447/#review63024
-----------------------------------------------------------


+1, makes sense to me, I don't see a drawback to further checking :)

- Aleix Pol Gonzalez


On July 24, 2014, 12:10 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119447/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 24, 2014, 12:10 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdelibs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> For some historical reasons, both results were not checked.
> On one side, a parsing error could lead to a failure in one of the subsequent call (doc is NULL), but a validation error could pass unnoticed if not by checking the logs (hint: it happened recently with a libxml2 regression).
> 
> I propose this change for KDE/4.14 too, and it will be forward-ported to KDocTools/KF5.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kdoctools/xslt.cpp 4d64de4 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119447/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compilation of kdelibs and few modules with documentation.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Luigi Toscano
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20140724/52a18683/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
kde-doc-english mailing list
kde-doc-english at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-doc-english