[Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure
Albert Astals Cid
aacid at kde.org
Fri Dec 19 22:26:15 GMT 2014
El Dijous, 18 de desembre de 2014, a les 14:52:12, Sebastian Kügler va
> On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 08:47:09 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> > I understood that to be the case -- I'm really meaning for a general,
> > KDE-wide solution.
> > Personally I don't have an issue with volunteers taking care of
> > non-official systems if it helps their productivity. If Gerrit wasn't
> > where KDE as a whole went, and you wanted to put the effort in to keep
> > Gerrit working for you and integrated with the rest of the KDE systems,
> > more power to you.
> > The issue I see (which doesn't necessarily reflect my personal views) is
> > that KDE projects have been required to use KDE infrastructure. I forget
> > where that's written/required, but I do know that that it exists. The
> > purpose of this was to avoid fragmentation or making it difficult to
> > find the full breadth of KDE projects, or requiring KDE developers to
> > sign up for multiple e.g. bugtracking systems just to comment on another
> > KDE project.
> I think you're referring to manifesto.kde.org. There's nothing in there
> about Reviewboard, or a requirement that project have to use infrastructure
> hosted at kde.org, so I don't see that as a blocker.
I don't agree with that you said, manifesto says
"Online services associated with the project are either hosted on KDE
infrastructure or have an action plan that ensures continuity which is
approved by the KDE system administration team"
> Of course it would be prudent to give KDE's sysadmin's access at some point,
> but it's not required per se.
> > I tend to be productivity-oriented rather than dogmatic, but I certainly
> > don't speak for everyone on that point.
More information about the kde-core-devel