Packaging KDE Foundation 5 frameworks

Kevin Ottens ervin at
Mon Oct 14 07:57:17 BST 2013


On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:10:03 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-*
> prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE
> seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM).
> [1]

It does makes sense to me to introduce such a prefix. Except for ECM indeed 
which is more agnostic and about a cmake addon at that point (it's considered 
as a KF5 upstream).
> My other question is about the modularization of kdelibs. Do you intend
> to split it into separate GIT repositories?

Yes. It's not done yet though as we still keep moving code around. Once it'll 
settle will split out repositories though.

Kévin Ottens,

Sponsored by KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE,
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list