Packaging KDE Foundation 5 frameworks
Kevin Ottens
ervin at kde.org
Mon Oct 14 07:57:17 BST 2013
Hello,
On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:10:03 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-*
> prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE
> seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM).
> [1]
It does makes sense to me to introduce such a prefix. Except for ECM indeed
which is more agnostic and about a cmake addon at that point (it's considered
as a KF5 upstream).
> My other question is about the modularization of kdelibs. Do you intend
> to split it into separate GIT repositories?
Yes. It's not done yet though as we still keep moving code around. Once it'll
settle will split out repositories though.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
Sponsored by KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20131014/cce3d9be/attachment.sig>
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list