Packaging KDE Foundation 5 frameworks

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello,

On Wednesday 09 October 2013 11:10:03 Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> I'm wondering what's your position on naming the packages? Does kf5-*
> prefix (kf5-solid, kf5-extra-cmake-modules) make sense to you? OpenSUSE
> seems to use that (except that they don't include the prefix for ECM).
> [1]

It does makes sense to me to introduce such a prefix. Except for ECM indeed 
which is more agnostic and about a cmake addon at that point (it's considered 
as a KF5 upstream).
 
> My other question is about the modularization of kdelibs. Do you intend
> to split it into separate GIT repositories?

Yes. It's not done yet though as we still keep moving code around. Once it'll 
settle will split out repositories though.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

Sponsored by KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks
KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20131014/cce3d9be/attachment.sig>