Review Request 110687: DrKonqi should check for disabled version as the very first step in the reporting assistant.

Jekyll Wu adaptee at
Wed Jun 5 11:05:24 BST 2013

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

(Updated June 5, 2013, 10:05 a.m.)

Review request for KDE Runtime and George Kiagiadakis.


Fix spelling and grammer errors


As I have said in ,  Bugzilla's new and nice behavior (since 4.2.5) of rejecting reports against disabled versions brings a new usability problem to DrKonqi: users spend value time in downloading debug symbols, generating the backtrace, writing all information he/she can recall, but in the end only to find an error dialog telling them (in a not so clear and friendly way) that won't accept his/her report. 

I would propose making version checking the very first step in the reporting assistant: a perfect bug report against an outdated version is still useless. 

The patch has been created for sometime and works, but unfortunately I don't have much time for coding since then, so it is not as good as what I have planned to make it to be. Nevertheless, I think it is still a good improvement of the current situation.

This addresses bug 315073.

Diffs (updated)

  drkonqi/CMakeLists.txt 39833d7 
  drkonqi/drkonqi_globals.h d5f098a 
  drkonqi/productmapping.h f926c9d 
  drkonqi/productmapping.cpp f4e59e5 
  drkonqi/reportassistantdialog.cpp c296059 
  drkonqi/reportassistantpages_bugzilla_versioncheck.h PRE-CREATION 
  drkonqi/reportassistantpages_bugzilla_versioncheck.cpp PRE-CREATION 
  drkonqi/reportinterface.h c7e374e 
  drkonqi/reportinterface.cpp 4190c40 
  drkonqi/ui/assistantpage_versioncheck.ui PRE-CREATION 



File Attachments

rejecting disabled version
reject disabled versions (revised edition)


Jekyll Wu

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list