Review Request: khtml: Fix memleak in DOMStringImpl::lower usage

[Commit Hook]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105099/#review18559
-----------------------------------------------------------


This review has been submitted with commit f19aef62921ab0a840d8e2a6e1b7e7ff6c12500f by Bernd Buschinski to branch KDE/4.9.

- Commit Hook


On May 29, 2012, 6:05 p.m., Bernd Buschinski wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105099/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 29, 2012, 6:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> khtml: Fix memleak in DOMStringImpl::lower usage
> 
> DOMStringImpl::lower() returns a new lower DOMStringImp*, which needs to be freed.
> While it does make sense for all other places, and in all other places we keep proper track of it, this is not the case in 
> khtml::ProspectiveTokenizer::processAttribute() (htmlprospectivetokenizer.cpp:720)
> 
> 
> This fixed memleaks like:
> 
> ==17681== 728 (512 direct, 216 indirect) bytes in 16 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2,907 of 3,059
> ==17681==    at 0x4C2ABE7: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:287)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A7D38E9: DOM::DOMStringImpl::lower() const (dom_stringimpl.cpp:396)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A802734: khtml::ProspectiveTokenizer::processAttribute() (htmlprospectivetokenizer.cpp:720)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A803DEF: khtml::ProspectiveTokenizer::tokenize(khtml::TokenizerString const&) (htmlprospectivetokenizer.cpp:540)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A7FD0D7: khtml::HTMLTokenizer::scriptHandler() (htmltokenizer.cpp:497)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A7FD4DC: khtml::HTMLTokenizer::parseRawContent(khtml::TokenizerString&) (htmltokenizer.cpp:379)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A7FE972: khtml::HTMLTokenizer::parseTag(khtml::TokenizerString&) (htmltokenizer.cpp:1528)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A7FF15D: khtml::HTMLTokenizer::write(khtml::TokenizerString const&, bool) (htmltokenizer.cpp:1797)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A74AC77: KHTMLPart::write(char const*, int) (khtml_part.cpp:2096)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A740E71: KHTMLPart::slotRestoreData(QByteArray const&) (khtml_part.cpp:1763)
> ==17681==    by 0x1A76610E: KHTMLPart::qt_static_metacall(QObject*, QMetaObject::Call, int, void**) (khtml_part.moc:255)
> ==17681==    by 0x78B8306: QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, QMetaObject const*, int, void**) (qobject.cpp:3547)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   khtml/html/htmlprospectivetokenizer.cpp 0e58709 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105099/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bernd Buschinski
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120905/169fec4b/attachment.htm>