Review request: moving libkgoogle to extragear

Kevin Ottens ervin at kde.org
Wed May 30 17:10:53 BST 2012


On Wednesday 30 May 2012 17:47:31 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:56:00 PM Dan Vratil wrote:
> > On Monday 28 of May 2012 20:34:51 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > > libgapi seems ok to me.
> > 
> > I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename the
> > library and everything inside to LibKGAPI.
> 
> What about LibQGAPI ?
> 
> There is a trend of making libraries called "tier1" which only depend on Qt.

Note however that we use the "K" naming in those though. It's a vendor thing, 
the Qt (for libs) and Q (for libs and classes) namespaces are for the Qt 
project itself. The KDE community uses the K namespace in most cases.

So for something produced and hosted by the KDE community I think libkgapi is 
a more proper name than libqgapi.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120530/265563e2/attachment.sig>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list