QtScript considered dangerous

[Dominik Haumann]

On Friday, 25. May 2012 21:42:50 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Still, a fix for QtScript would be the nicest solution or a port to the
> > "new" engine provided in Qt5, as I understood, there QtScript is anyway
> > "deprecated" in favour of the V8 based new variant?
> 
> Nope. QtScript might be 'done' - meaning no one is working on it and there's
> no replacement. The v8 stuff is not public API like QtScript is, so it is
> not a replacement.
> 
> > But does the new engine provide the same nice features to easily wrap your
> > objects and expose a custom API?
> 
> Yes. That's how QtDeclarative works. As it's internal, non-public API, that
> doesn't really matter much.
> 
> Maybe a public API will be created to replace QtScript eventually though...

According to the docs http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/5.0/qjsengine.html
QJSEngine and QJSValue are already public API. Maybe I'm mistaken?

Dominik