Nepomuk - Moving out of kde-runtime

[Kevin Krammer]

On Thursday, 2012-05-17, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBus
> interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
> supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...

I think as long as you didn't advertise the D-Bus interfaces as a kind of 
public API, e.g. by installing D-Bus introspection XML files, that should be 
fine.

Cheers,
Kevin

> 
> On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <me at vhanda.in> wrote:
> >> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in
> >> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot of
> >> things.
> > 
> > NACK.
> > 
> > this is a completely no go.
> > 
> > /Sune
> > 
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> >> unsubscribe <<

-- 
Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer
KDE user support, developer mentoring
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120517/3aa09c27/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<