[Nepomuk] The Nepomuk Situation

[Vishesh Handa]

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:

> Sounds great. However, it requires one more step:
>
> Create the new repositories we decided on a while ago for the kcm, the
> kio slaves and such. This basically means to do "git filter-branch"[1]
> as I did for nepomuk-core.
>

Have fun :) Btw, what do you want to call it? nepomuk-kde?

I think we should even include the stuff from kdelibs/nepomuk/utils/.


>
> [1]
>
> http://gbayer.com/development/moving-files-from-one-git-repository-to-another-preserving-history/
>
> On 05/10/2012 09:32 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > Does anyone have any objections to the current plan?
> >
> > * Remove kde-runtime/nepomuk
> > * All nepomuk development happens in nepomuk-core
> >     * nepomuk-core will install everything with a Nepomuk2 namespace
> > * Applications will have to explicitly depend on nepomuk-core if they
> > want to use the new APIs
> >
> > The old APIs will continue to work exactly the way they work right now.
> >
> > --
> > Vishesh Handa
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>



-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120511/b8008e77/attachment.htm>